5. Chemistry
Nuclear fission
I was about 12
years old when I learnt how to make an atomic bomb. In theory, you understand,
not in practice. It’s really quite simple. All you have to do is gather
together a sufficient amount of the right kind of Uranium and bang it together
pretty quickly.
Uranium comes in
two flavours – U-235 and U-238. U-238 is stable and fairly boring. It is also
the most common kind – just as well, really. Actually, there is also a very
small amount of U-234, but that’s not very significant.
U-235 is a
different kettle of fish. It is unstable, and if it is hit by a passing
neutron, it splits into two lighter atoms, and (here’s the trick), two or three
new neutrons. According to the rules of atom construction, there is also a
surplus of energy given off as radiation. This is where the famous e=mc² comes
in; some of the mass of the atom (the ‘m’ bit) is converted into energy (the
‘e’ bit). And because the ‘c’ bit is the speed of light, which is very fast,
it’s a big number and so the energy is a lot. The energy given off by all the
atoms in a pound of U-235 is about the same as that contained in a million
gallons of petrol. This all happens pretty quickly you understand, in fact in
about one picosecond (that’s one millionth of a millionth of a second – I said
it was fast).
Now those
following closely will have noticed that we started with one neutron, and ended
up with two or three. These extra neutrons wander off and, probably, hit some
more U-235 atoms. Then even more neutrons are given off, and more energy. Sound
familiar? This is positive feedback with a vengeance. The whole process is over
before you can blink an eye, and a large mushroom cloud starts rising. This is,
of course, an atomic bomb – or a fission device (because the atoms are split,
as opposed to a Hydrogen or fusion bomb, where they are combined).
For this process
to create a fission device, there must be enough U-235 to keep the chain
reaction going; this amount is called the critical mass. There also must
be a high percentage of U-235 - around 90%. Luckily it is quite difficult to
make enriched Uranium at this level, partly because there is about 140 times as
much U-238 as U-235. It is also actually quite tricky to bang together the
pieces quickly enough to get a nuclear explosion. If they don’t come together
fast enough they start to overheat too soon, and the whole mess sort of goes
off half cocked. So I never got to actually make a nuclear bomb, but I did make
some satisfactorily loud bangs with a mix of chemicals that I now shudder to
recall. I also made a wide collection of fireworks, guided by some ‘do it
yourself’ books that would surely not be published nowadays. Nor, I imagine,
would my friendly local chemist sell me the lethal assortment of chemicals that
I asked him for – I would probably receive a visit from the securities agencies
instead.
Nuclear reactors
A nuclear reactor
in a power station also uses enriched Uranium, but only around three percent
U-235 is needed in this case. Typically, the Uranium is made into rods, and the
rods are made into bundles. The bundles are then placed in a coolant, such as
water, inside a pressure vessel. The U-235 does its thing, splitting up and
releasing neutrons. If these hit a U-238 atom, they get absorbed. If they hit
another U-235, it will probably split up and release more neutrons. But because
the U-238 slows things down a lot, the reactor doesn’t explode. It just gets
hot, and the heat is extracted to generate electric power. Now the neutrons in
reactors are low energy or ‘slow’ neutrons, rather than their more energetic
cousins in a nuclear bomb, but the principle is similar. Just a lot safer.
Actually, things
are a bit more tricky. Water slows down neutrons, as well as being a coolant,
and the slower neutrons are better absorbed by U-235, so the water increases
the reaction rate.
Control rods are
used to control the rate of the nuclear reaction, by raising or lowering them
into the Uranium bundles. By absorbing neutrons, they can slow down the
reaction.
That’s not quite
the end of the story however. When U-238 absorbs a neutron, it changes into
PU-239, otherwise known as Plutonium. Now Plutonium does split when hit by a
neutron, so it can be used as fuel itself – this is the case in the so called
‘Breeder Reactors’.
So, as is often
the case in messy real life, there are several layers of feedback going on
here.
Meltdown
If something
nasty goes wrong in a nuclear reactor it could start a process leading to
meltdown. This is really another example of thermal runaway. Excessive heat
generated in one part of the reactor could lock up the operation of moderator elements, leading to increased
reaction and heat generation. This could, in theory, lead to the whole mess
getting so hot that the entire reactor melts. Now safety is something that the
nuclear industry takes pretty seriously, so there are all kinds of mechanisms
to make sure that this kind of thing does not happen.
But sometimes
things go wrong, as in Three Mile Island , where a partial meltdown did occur. The exact details are complicated,
but basically the safety mechanisms designed to cope with a component failure
did not operate as planned.
Later at Chernobyl , there was a full meltdown. Again, there
was a complex sequence of events, but ironically the main cause of the accident
was a test of the safety systems that went wrong.
Meltdowns cannot
cause nuclear explosions, because the geometry of the plant simply does not
allow this to happen. But accidents at nuclear plants can cause explosions
through excess pressure.
Explosions
A chemical
explosion, using something like gunpowder, for example, is another form of
thermal runaway. Some trigger causes part of the chemical to react and burn
extremely quickly. This causes heat and a pressure shock wave to move through
the rest of the chemical. The action of this increased energy causes other
parts to react and burn and generate even more heat and pressure. This whole
process takes place so quickly that it causes an explosion, with a consequent
release of hot gases and a pressure wave. Another example of the bad effects of
positive feedback (unless the explosion is being used for good purposes of
course).
Auto Catalytic Reactions
Catalysts are
chemicals that help speed up chemical reactions. They don’t actually get
involved in the reaction except temporarily. The amount of a catalyst is
unchanged after the reaction, but it sort of gets lent to the process, and
returned afterwards. Think of it like a bank lending money to a company to help
it improve its operations, and then getting it back. Only catalysts do not
charge interest.
Some chemicals
are auto catalysts; that is they
catalyse a reaction that creates themselves. This should sound familiar by now,
it is starting to sound like a loop. Chemical A takes other chemicals B and C
and help them make more A, more A makes more A. Pretty obviously, this can rapidly
make lots of A in rather the same way as an explosion. Auto catalysts are very
interesting, because it is possible that life started in some similar manner.
The point is that, given some raw chemical ingredients, we have a mechanism for
producing lots of copies of something. And copying is akin to reproduction.
Experiments with auto catalysts have shown that variation in the copying also
takes place, which is one of the other prerequisites for evolution to take
place. You can’t have evolution if all the copies are identical, it relies on
having variation and selection.
Supercooling
This is not,
sadly, a tale of people who are super cool. A supercool liquid is one that is
colder than its normal freezing point, so for water that would be below zero
Centigrade. How can that happen? Well, when a liquid freezes, it goes through
quite an arduous process where the molecular structure completely changes to a
lower energy state. Although falling temperature pushes the liquid down this
path, it can need a little help to get things going.
This help can be in the
form of impurities in the water that act as nuclei for the new structures to
form around – a bit like catalysts. If the water is very pure (as in distilled
or de ionised water), there aren’t enough impurities to get things started,
especially if the water is quite still. Any change in the circumstance, like
introducing some impurities, or disturbing the water, can trigger an avalanche
type effect where the whole lot rapidly freezes – or at least forms ice
crystals. It is positive feedback at work again as each freezing event triggers
adjacent ones.
This actually
happened to me once. When I was a teenager I had a large shed in our garden
which I used as a chemistry laboratory, full of wondrous supplies of chemicals
and apparatus (well, I though it was wonderful at the time). I entered one very
cold morning and observed a glass beaker full of unfrozen distilled water.
Poking the water with a glass rod immediately caused the whole beaker to become
a mess of ice slush. So I know this works.
The same thing
applies if a vapour is over saturated, it can stay a vapour when it ‘should’
really condense. Some newcomer moving in can cause the vapour to condense
around it as it passes through. This mechanism is used in nuclear physics as
particle detection ‘cloud chambers’, though bubble chambers are now more
common. These again use a similar mechanism, where a liquid is caused to bubble
into a gas by incoming particles.
No comments:
Post a Comment